1/ AI application method: MACE-family machine-learned interatomic potential(MLIP)
2/ Task: MLIP training and evaluation using solid-liquid interface data
3/ Reported result: built a first-principles dataset of 15,400,000 structures and demonstrated applicability in training, validation, and test splits with a MACE model
4/ The 2026-09-23 release presented SoLiD26, a first-principles dataset for solid-liquid interfaces.
5/ The paper reported that the dataset consists of 15,400,000 structures and demonstrated its applicability in training, validation, and test splits with a machine-learned interatomic potential(MLIP) of the MACE family.
6/ From a materials research standpoint, this means the dataset provides large-scale reference data needed to develop MLIPs that learn interface structures and interactions.
7/ Solid-liquid interfaces are especially important in catalytic, electrochemical, melting, and solidification-related problems, so such a dataset can be useful for model development and comparative evaluation.
8/ However, the result shown in the release is a demonstration based on that dataset and split.
9/ Whether the same performance is maintained for other interface combinations, other temperature or composition conditions, or extrapolation regions requires additional validation. [1]
Materials AI · written by AI
SoLiD26 demonstrates MLIP training and validation with 15,400,000 structures for solid-liquid interfaces
SoLiD26 is a first-principles dataset for solid-liquid interfaces containing 15,400,000 structures, and it was shown to be applicable in training, validation, and test splits with a MACE-family MLIP. The key point is that it provides large-scale reference data for developing interatomic potentials for interface phenomena. However, performance outside the dataset distribution and split scheme requires separate confirmation. [1]
How to apply this
To train an interatomic potential for a solid-liquid interface and test energy and force prediction.
- Preprocess interface structures consistently and organize energy and force labels.
- Train the MACE-family MLIP and tune hyperparameters based on validation error.
- Evaluate energy and force errors on the test set, and if necessary, decompose performance by difficulty level.
- Verify that the model is physically consistent through independent molecular dynamics or structural stability validation.
- Data needed
- First-principles structures including interfaces, energy and force labels, and enough samples to split into training, validation, and test sets are needed.
- Checking the result
- Report energy and force errors on a holdout set, and confirm physical consistency through independent MD or structural stability tests.
- What can go wrong
- The most common failure is that energy and force predictions deteriorate sharply when moving to interface states with different distributions.
이 가이드는 원문의 방법을 바탕으로 AI가 제안한 적용 방향입니다. 원문에 적힌 내용이 아니며 같은 결과가 재현된다는 보장도 아닙니다.
Related concepts and practice
이 이슈를 읽는 데 필요한 개념입니다. 용어마다 Colab에서 바로 돌려볼 수 있는 실습 노트북이 있습니다.
- 머신러닝 원자간 포텐셜Machine Learning Interatomic Potential · MLIP · MLFF · 기계학습 포텐셜 Practise in Colab ↗Download notebook
- 학습·검증·시험 분할Train/Validation/Test Split Practise in Colab ↗Download notebook
- 분자동역학Molecular Dynamics · MD Practise in Colab ↗Download notebook
- 소재 데이터베이스Materials Project · OQMD · ICSD · AFLOW Practise in Colab ↗Download notebook
- 머신러닝Machine Learning · ML · 기계학습 Practise in Colab ↗Download notebook
- 원자간 포텐셜Interatomic Potential
Sources
웹 자료를 바탕으로 AI가 자동 요약한 글입니다. 연구의 세부 조건과 결과는 연결된 원문을 확인해주세요.