1/ AI utilization method: DeepDelivery-based AI screening and interpretive analysis
2/ Applied task: Large-scale screening of scaffold candidates for mRNA delivery among human proteins
3/ Reported results: 512 candidates were proposed, 12 of 15 functioned as actual scaffold components, and delivery performance was improved by TRIM25 engineering
4/ This study used an AI-based platform called DeepDelivery to identify, at large scale, scaffold candidates among human proteins for use in mRNA delivery.
5/ Proteome-scale screening proposed 512 candidates, and when 15 were selected and tested, 12 functioned as actual scaffold components.
6/ In addition, interpretive analysis identified features related to the TRIM domain, and based on this, TRIM25 domain engineering was performed, leading to improved delivery performance.
7/ From a materials and chemistry perspective, this is an example in which AI-based screening and interpretable feature extraction were used together in the design of protein-based delivery carriers.
8/ However, these results were obtained for a specific protein set and mRNA delivery task, so they cannot be directly generalized to other protein families or other delivery conditions.
9/ Although experimental validation was included, there are still limitations in the number of candidates and the validation scope. [1]
Materials AI · written by AI
AI Large-Scale Screening of Human Protein Scaffolds for mRNA Delivery Candidates, Performance Improved by TRIM25 Engineering
The Nature Communications paper used an AI-based platform called DeepDelivery to screen human proteins at large scale for scaffold candidates for mRNA delivery. Proteome-scale screening proposed 512 candidates, 15 were selected, and 12 acted as actual scaffold components. Interpretive analysis identified TRIM domain features, and TRIM25 domain engineering improved delivery performance. [1]
How to apply this
Use AI to prioritize delivery carrier candidates in your own protein or polymer library, then experimentally validate a small number of candidates.
- First, organize the candidate sequences or structures into a standardized format and collect experimental values related to delivery performance.
- Next, score the candidates with an AI model and select the top candidates together with control groups.
- Evaluate the selected candidates in an actual delivery assay, and if necessary redesign them at the domain level.
- Reconfirm the candidates that performed well through a separate validation set and repeated experiments.
- Data needed
- A candidate sequence or structure library, information on the delivery cargo, a cellular or in vitro delivery evaluation system, and comparator control candidates are needed.
- Checking the result
- Check whether the AI-selected candidates function at a higher rate than random selection in experiments, and whether the same trend appears in an independent test set or additional replicate experiments.
- What can go wrong
- Predictions can easily fail for sequence ranges or delivery conditions different from the training data, and interpreted features should not be taken to be causal rules outright.
이 가이드는 원문의 방법을 바탕으로 AI가 제안한 적용 방향입니다. 원문에 적힌 내용이 아니며 같은 결과가 재현된다는 보장도 아닙니다.
Related concepts and practice
이 이슈를 읽는 데 필요한 개념입니다. 용어마다 Colab에서 바로 돌려볼 수 있는 실습 노트북이 있습니다.
- 머신러닝Machine Learning · ML · 기계학습 Practise in Colab ↗Download notebook
- 고속 스크리닝High-throughput Screening · HTS · 다단 스크리닝 Practise in Colab ↗Download notebook
- 해석 가능한 머신러닝Interpretable Machine Learning
- 특징과 기술자Feature · Descriptor · 피처 Practise in Colab ↗Download notebook
- 역설계Inverse Design Practise in Colab ↗Download notebook
Sources
웹 자료를 바탕으로 AI가 자동 요약한 글입니다. 연구의 세부 조건과 결과는 연결된 원문을 확인해주세요.